Just had this rather interesting screen corruption. I think I'd just done a wash of unwanted emails.
As you can see, one of the "washed" emails was still visible with the delete tick still showing. I have blurred the email addresses for security.
If I collapsed all of the different status sections then it was still displayed:
Minimising MW didn't fix the problem. I had to close and restart it.
David
Interesting screen corruption
- anniebrion
- βeta Tester
- Contact:
- Location: Milkyway, Sol, Earth, UK, London
Post
Re: Interesting screen corruption
This is a known problem with the grid software that is used by MWP, this is supplied by a 3rd party and as such is difficult to get fixed 

Annie.......... PC details
Mailwasher Pro βeta [v 7.12.39]
Mailwasher Pro βeta [v 7.12.39]
-
ru
Post
Re: Interesting screen corruption
If scrolling doesn't clear the issue, you can just clear the grid by pressing C then Y on the keyboard, then just recheck the account. Much faster than restarting.
- dvdvnr
- Student Sheep
Post
Re: Interesting screen corruption
Thanks anniebrion - ah, 3rd party software, fine until it isn't!anniebrion wrote:This is a known problem with the grid software that is used by MWP, this is supplied by a 3rd party and as such is difficult to get fixed

-
ru
Post
It may yet be our fault in how we're using it, yet to be fully proven.
Though we're sure we're doing everything right so far.
Re: Interesting screen corruption
dvdvnr wrote:Thanks anniebrion - ah, 3rd party software, fine until it isn't!anniebrion wrote:This is a known problem with the grid software that is used by MWP, this is supplied by a 3rd party and as such is difficult to get fixed
It may yet be our fault in how we're using it, yet to be fully proven.

Though we're sure we're doing everything right so far.
- dvdvnr
- Student Sheep
Post
Re: Interesting screen corruption
Inconsitencies between how they say it works and how it actually works? Documentation at least 1 version out of date? Situation absolutely normal then (going by my experience)rusticdog wrote:It may yet be our fault in how we're using it, yet to be fully proven.![]()
Though we're sure we're doing everything right so far.
